🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.